Monday, June 18, 2012
Development v Anti-development: all in a word
One of the most shocking thing for me was being labelled anti-development during a phone interview in Parliament house, Canberra.
I've been contemplating that label and after much medication on the mysteries of development I've come to the conclusion that 'development' is perhaps a word that is open to interpretation.
If you are a Chinese miner about to dump millions of toxic wastes into the Bismarck Sea and threaten the web of life with toxic heavy metals an carcinogenic substances, those who want to prevent a humanitarian disaster are 'anti-development'.
One of the 'benefits' of Ok Tedi mine's tailings discharge has been the 'improvements' in the waterways that drain the East Transfly region. The current flooding of this area, which is where I come from, is largely linked to developments in the Fly River due to increased sedimentation due to mine tailings being discharged from Ok Tedi. Some call it development, I call it bag armament.
Now as Abraham Lincoln once famously said, government is "for the people and by the people". The American revolution stemmed from the belief amongst Americans that the British Crown was not acting in their best interest. Now I for one am not suggesting the overthrowing of the State but one should not expect the people to be indifferent to the state if the state continues to fail them. To suggest that Papua New Guineans work with-in the existing mechanisms is like telling the Jews to appeal to the moral values of Hitler, in order to free themselves from concentration camps.
The gestapo elite who flaunt their ill-gotten wealth and status are toasted by those whom they work with to bring 'real development' in PNG. Millions of Papua New Guineans will die, now and in the future, due to the destruction of their traditional livelihoods and the contamination of their natural food sources. I guess that is development. Genocide must then be called development.
Following this general elections, there has to be a general reorganization of social, economic and political order in PNG. I trust that a general consultive process that is inclusive and along the lines of the First Constitutional Planning Committee meetings, will be beneficial for the country. There is a need for redistribution of power and National Wealth.
Unless this happens, the elite will continue to be totally unaccountable and self-serving thus undermining the viability and integrity of the Nation State. Bougainville is soon to gain Independence from PNG and as power struggles continue in Waigani due to the fact that all power is vested in Waigani, it is not unforeseeable that separatist movements would emerge.
There is a limit to the patience of all human beings. It took 20 years of patience until the Bougainvilleans became totally fed up with a system that was basically screwing their lives and giving them peanuts. How long will the patience of the rest of Papua New Guinea be tested? Now here's a development we all don't want to see!
Sent from my iPad